9fans archive / 2008 / 01 / 134 prev next
From: Sergey Zhilkin <szhilkin@gma...>
Subject: OLE vs. 9P
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:36:55 +0300
>Okay, let's start with an Canvas. I've collected some ideas:
drawterm as browser plugin ?? :)
2008/1/10, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@met...>:
>
> * Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, in that case it seems that it would be indeed, all you need.
> > I'm very far from being an expert on how modern browsers are designed,
> > but it seems the only shared thing between a browser and a plugin
> > should be set of rectangular framebuffers. I would expect the rest
> > of resources to be either available as-is (audio, etc.) or be request
> > from the browser in a general fashion (bookmarks, history, etc.).
>
> hmm, just had a quick look through the swfdec plugin code ...
> Seems to be some bit more. There are also things like input
> stream, URL access, etc.
>
> Okay, let's start with an Canvas. I've collected some ideas:
>
> * http://oss-qm.metux.de/index.php/9forge/Canvas
>
> > The trickiest part seems to be exploring locality for the mapped
> > rendering (imagine a multimedia plugin displaying an HD movie).
>
> Those things require special interfaces, which tunnel streams
> through 9P. Maybe something like mjpeg with timestamps.
>
>
> cu
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
> http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
> Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
> http://patches.metux.de/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
ó õ×ÁÖÅÎÉÅÍ
öÉÌËÉÎ óÅÒÇÅÊ