9fans archive / 2006 / 09 / 387 prev next
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@qua...>
Subject: linux il/ip
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:33:00 -0500
in my limited experience, the file server is much easier to set up,
makes fewer demands on hardware and exhibits lower lantency
than venti+fossil running on a cpu kernel.
but if you're going to run a cpu kernel, i see no point in the file
server code.
- erik
On Tue Sep 26 12:19:23 CDT 2006, rsc@swt... wrote:
> The only even plausible reason is to connect to old
> Plan 9 file servers, but your effort would be better spent
> writing some glue so that the old file server code could
> run in user space on standard kernels.