9fans archive / 2006 / 05 / 272    prev next

search terms are split using tokenize from:regexp searches From: lines subject:regexp searches Subject: lines before:yyyy[/mm[/dd]] and after:yyyy[/mm[/dd]] specify date range powered by grep(1)
From: Abhey Shah <as234@yor...> Subject: Plan 9 source tarballs or cvsup? Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:55:34 +0100 Hi, If you use a linux kernel greater then 2.6.14 then you should be able to do something like this (you might need to use the numerical ip address) sudo mount -t 9p sources.cs.bell-labs.com /mnt/9 then cd /mnt/9/plan9/sys/src has the source code of the system with the kernel code in 9 or download and install inferno and do mount -A tcp!sources.cs.bell-labs.com!9fs /n/remote in a shell from within inferno Abhey On 31 May 2006, at 11:25, Robert Watson wrote: > > Dear Plan9er's, > > For the last couple of years, I've been running a kernel source code > reference, fxr.watson.org, that contains the kernel sources of a > number of operating systems (initially FreeBSD and Linux, now also > many other BSD's, Open Solaris, Darwin, etc). I did this because I > wanted a place I could go to easily compare design approaches and > implementations of kernels; however, it appears I now have a pretty > large number of regular visitors. > > I've had a number of requests to include Plan 9 source on the site, > but have always stalled in adding it when reaching a somewhat critical > question: how to get the source code? I must be approaching this the > wrong way! I've perused the cm.bell-labs.com wiki a moderate amount, > and discovered it's easy to download a compiled ISO, to peruse the > source online, or to find directions for downloading the source using > integrated Plan 9 tools. I've been having trouble finding a way to > automatically update a local copy of the source on a FreeBSD box > (i.e., cvs cvsup, anonymous cvs, rsync, ..), which is what I need in > order to put it up on the web site. That or a simple source tarball I > can update once in a while. > > I'm probably being stupid, and have missed the patently obvious, and a > pointer at that obvious thing would be most welcome. > > Thanks, > > Robert N M Watson >