9fans archive / 2006 / 05 / 260 prev next
From: quanstro@qua...
Subject: 3 questions
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 02:35:22 -0500
seppuku.
On Mon May 29 23:45:44 CDT 2006, rminnich@lan... wrote:
> lucio@pro... wrote:
>
> > Well, what's so bad about editing raw HTML? It is considerably more
> > embarrassing to publish the type of unreadable trash (only its mother
> > could love that HTML!) produced by the average HTML editor. Take a
> > look, sometimes.
>
> It's not me. It's a user. This is a very common problem. I just edit
> html myself. But I was wondering if there was something more acceptable
> under plan 9 than raw html.
>
> thanks
>
> ron