9fans archive / 2000 / 05 / 45 / prev next From: Digby Tarvin digbyt@acm.org Subject: [9fans] (the potential) new release of Plan9, i386 only? Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:55:43 GMT > >I could live with a distribution that perhaps only came with Intel > >binaries, but at least had the sources and cross compilers to allow > >building of systems for other architectures. I have two Sparc2's > >which are not fast, but they are nicer to work on and have lasted > >much better than Intel machines of similar vintage. > > I have been interested reacently In buying a non-*86 machine, But I > have found it next to imposible to find a comparison between the sun > machines and the *86 machines, ie. is a sparc5 better or worse than a > pentium? Could you give me some guidelines? > I would have to dig around for some benchmarks, but I think the conventional wisdom is that my Sparc 2's are comparable to 66Mhz 486 machines in processing power. But they 'feel' much better because of the better disk subsystem and architecture, and I don't feel I need a vary fast CPU for compiling code. I havn't looked recently, but if you need speed, you will probably have to pay more for a Sun than an equivalent Intel PC, purely because of the relative market sizes. If I wanted somthing with a bit more processing power but still a usable architecture, I would probably go PowerPC. It looked like being in with a chance at being an alternate 'standard' architecture up until OS-2 ceased to be effective competition for Microsoft, which resulted in Microsoft deciding it could afford to please its Intel ally by discontinuing the PowerPC version of NT. One of the things I like about Plan9 is that it makes it so easy to manage a heterogenous environment, so at least you don't have to be tied in to one architecture. I would really like to hear any impressions that the Plan9 developers formed as a result of porting the system to numerous architectures. The task must have provided an ideal opportunity to compare the merits of the varous platforms. Regards, DigbyT -- Digby R. S. Tarvin digbyt@acm.org http://www.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk