9fans archive / 1999 / 01 / 32 /    prev next

From: mail-9de~smv8_at_9de~smv8@smt... mail-9de~smv8_at_9de~smv8@smt...
Subject: [9fans] cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 99 18:53:02 -0700


--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ACSII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Message is undeliverable.
Reason: Unable to access cc:Mail Post office.
	Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------


--simple boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ACSII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: from cse.psu.edu by smtp2.irm.r9.fws.gov (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.01)
	; Wed, 20 Jan 99 01:24:42 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-9fans@cse...>
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA28604;
	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:18:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:17:48 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA28535
	for 9fans-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:17:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f
Received: from mailgate.cadence.com (mailgate.Cadence.COM [158.140.2.1])
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA28526
	for <9fans@cse...>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:17:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by mailgate.cadence.com (8.8.5/8.6.8) id AAA21771 for <9fans@cse...>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from symnt3.Cadence.COM(194.32.101.100) by mailgate.cadence.com via smap (mjr-v1.2)
	id xma916820249.021760; Wed, 20 Jan 99 00:17:29 -0800
Received: by symnt3.Cadence.COM with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <CQK98145>; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:15:04 -0000
Message-ID: <1E485299309FD211A2100090271E27A4142D04@sym...>
From: Nigel Roles <ngr@sym...>
To: "'9fans@cse...'" <9fans@cse...>
Subject: RE: [9fans] time size
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:15:02 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sender: owner-9fans@cse...
Reply-To: 9fans@cse...
Precedence: bulk

>We could always bring back pdp10's and their 36 bit ints.

Were you FISHing for a flame there?  I think you got a....
Nibble.  And maybe four bytes.

Hey! Leave off PDP-10s. They had 9 bit chars. We might never have needed
Unicode.


--simple boundary--