9fans archive / 1998 / 10 / 95 / prev next From: G. David Butler gdb@dbS... Subject: [9fans] Re: failed installation of the 3 diskette system Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 06:45:04 -0600 >From: Richard Uhtenwoldt <roo@riv...> (replace roo with ru) >G. David Butler writes: >>I used to provide a distribution set, but I don't any longer. >>If you want to know why we (anybody with the shrink-wrap >>license) can NOT, see http://www.dbSystems.com > >okay, I read that last Web page, and the shrinkwrap license. >seems to me that you could distribute a diff against the >standard distribution set. (the xdelta program, an alternative >to "diff" and "patch", can deal gracefully with binary files.) Since making any source available in a public forum is strictly prohibited, so would a binary "diff". [The idea that a boodle is so useless to anybody without the source was promoted by the developers to allow some freedom, but I'm sure the attorneys at Lucent were not consulted. One could argue that since they (the developers acting as officials of Lucent) have relinquished their rights of redistribution so we should take advantage of it. I would NOT want to be sitting in a court room trying to make that argument!] Since Lucent is not bound by the shrink-wrap license, they can do whatever they want with their property including publishing the documents and updates on their web site plan9.bell-labs.com. We, on the other hand, are bound by: "Except as described in this section, you may not USE, copy, or TRANSFER the software, in SOURCE or in OBJECT form, or any MODIFICATION or DERIVATIVE work thereof, in whole or IN PART to any THIRD party." except if we have a way of determining that someone else has purchased the source code then: "You may transmit derived or modified portions of this software specifically to other licensees of AT&T (sic) who are bound by the terms of this Agreement..." I guess I should find a way (the xor trick, perhaps) to encrypt the multi-ethernet changes on my site to be fully complient. David Butler gdb@dbS...