9fans archive / 1997 / 12 / 61 /    prev next

From: jim mckie jmk@pla...
Subject: [9fans] Re: etherelnk3.c
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 23:30:28 -0500

actually, it's easier. you can turn a Block-based driver into
a filesystem driver with a handful of #defines, two trivial functions
and a couple of #ifdefs (i know, we don't actually approve of that).
#ifdefs are only necessary because Blocks use read and write pointers
and Msgbufs use a base and count.

--jim

------ forwarded message follows ------

>From cse.psu.edu!owner-9fans Mon Dec 15 13:30:30 EST 1997
Received: from cse.psu.edu ([130.203.3.50]) by plan9; Mon Dec 15 13:30:30 EST 1997
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA22716; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:29:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:29:24 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id NAA22677 for 9fans-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:29:19 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f
Received: from ns.dbSystems.com (root@ns.... [204.178.76.1]) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA22673 for <9fans@cse...>; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:29:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from gdb@localhost) by ns.dbSystems.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA16085 for 9fans@cse...; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:14:33 -0600
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:14:33 -0600
From: "G. David Butler" <dbSystems.com!gdb>
Message-Id: <199712151814.MAA16085@ns....>
To: cse.psu.edu!9fans
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: etherelnk3.c
Sender: cse.psu.edu!owner-9fans
Reply-To: cse.psu.edu!9fans
Precedence: bulk

>From: eld@jew... (Eric Dorman)
>> From: "G. David Butler" <gdb@dbS...>
>> To: 9fans@cse...
>> Subject: [9fans] Re: etherelnk3.c
>> 
>  Another thing to consider is how these changes would affect
>the integration of ether drivers between the fs and terminal code.
>Integrating these two trees first allieviates a whole mess of 
>existing problems and ensures that this type of effort won't 
>have to be done again (perhaps differently, even) for fs.

In fact the problem becomes worse since Blocks don't exist
in the fs.  There we would have to use Msgbufs.